How Two Dallas-Area Dental Offices Made Google Maps Their Largest Patient Source
Two offices in neighboring Dallas suburbs, competing in one of the most saturated dental markets in the country. Over twelve months the practice's two Google Business Profiles became its single largest source of new-patient contact.
Why two nearby locations require separate local-growth strategies
Two offices in adjacent suburbs of the same metro creates a specific problem that single-location practices never face. The two locations compete with each other for the same searches. They split the practice's authority across two sets of listings. And a patient searching from the middle can be shown either one, or neither.
Dallas makes that harder again. It's one of the most saturated dental markets in the country, so there's no slack in the auction and no forgiveness in the map pack.
The other thing worth naming: most of this practice's visibility opportunity wasn't on its website at all. It was in the map pack, where the two profiles either show up for a nearby searcher or they don't. So that's where the work went.
How did two Dallas-area offices make Google Maps their largest patient source?
By managing the two Google Business Profiles as two separate businesses, building city and service targeting per suburb, and tracking every call, form and text to the location and source that produced it.
Across twelve months that produced 1,155 tracked patient leads, 814 of them, about seven in ten, through the two Google profiles rather than the website.
How Titan Web Agency helped each office compete in its own local market
Two profiles, managed as two businesses
Separate service areas, categories and content for each location rather than one profile duplicated across both, which is what stops the two offices from cannibalizing each other in the map pack.
Local targeting built per market
City and service targeting built separately for each suburb instead of one metro-wide approach, so each office competes in the searches its own neighborhood actually runs.
Lead tracking across both locations
Every call, form and text captured and attributed to the profile or page that produced it, rather than pooled into one practice-wide total that hides which office is growing.
Source-level reporting the practice can act on
Reporting broken out by location and by channel, so the owners can see which office and which source is producing patients and make staffing and budget decisions on it.
70% of patient inquiries came directly through Google Maps
For a multi-location practice, that ratio is the whole argument for putting local SEO effort into the listings rather than the site alone.
Every engagement is founder-led. You work directly with Tyson, not an account rotation.
About Tyson Downs →How Does Your Practice Compare?
The Dental Marketing Scorecard grades your website, local search, reviews, and ads against what practices like this one have in place.
More Case Studies
Related dental practices we’ve helped grow:
From Missing to 547 Calls From Google Maps
An established practice that went from invisible to 547 Maps calls. Read the case study →
Multi-Location Rankings Back in a Month
Multi-location rankings recovered within a month. Read the case study →
#1 in Google and AI Across the Tri-Cities
Top rankings in Google and AI across a three-city market. Read the case study →